I have five key reasons for my angularjs to respond to migration. No, it’s not a contrast that’s better off. There would be no point in contrasting apples and oranges. React is a library, and a system is angular. They can both do things in their way. I hope to give you some clarity (that I have won) so that you can decide between the two on your projects.
React is not MVC
It is just a view library that can be used to build composable and reusable user interfaces. The reuse of user interface elements is very useful. Single Page Apps are using redundant components. The component gets input and retrieves the component instance as output. Unlike angular, it is sufficient if the component is specified once according to your needs, and can be used anywhere in your DOM.
React doesn’t use templates:
Updates are straightforward:
React follows a mechanism called conciliation. A lightweight representation of your view is created in this process. It happens when the part is initialized and the rendering method is called. The markup string is extracted from this representation and fed to the text. As a result, whenever a data change occurs, the render is called. Since it gives a slight representation, re-rendering is quick, and no data bindings need to be defined. It makes the development of applications a lot easier.
Unidirectional data flow:
As in Angular 1.x, there is no two-way data binding. The setState) (method updates the internal method states. Once the object state (this.state) is retrieved, the modified version of the feature will be rendered. The same shall apply to input(props). When an updated input arrives, the part will be updated using the rendering process. Therefore, you don’t have to manually adjust the input or internal variable status any time a shift occurs. Thus, the unidirectional data flow makes the answer even more reliable and simple to use.
Quick learning curve: